我可没那么多耐心看完说明书。
原文链接：https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20040603-00/?p=39033
Actual feedback submitted to the microsoft.com web site many years ago.
以下是一则提交到microsoft.com网站上的真实反馈件。
ID（编号）: 13726
Date（日期）: 1996-07-29 17:27:41.997
Name（姓名）: ***********
Email（电子邮件）: *************
Area（分类）: Windows 95
Comments（内容）:
PLEASE read this entire email as it is quite serious. I just discovered today that in the Windows 95 operating system, there are no switches, command line options, or any way whatsoever to have the XCOPY command include hidden/system files in it’s operations. It is clear that at some point in the development of the Windows 95 product, that somebody made a conscious decision to implement the xcopy command in this manner. It is also clear from looking at the Windows NT XCOPY command that it can be implemented in the manner I describe. Therefore, let me give fair warning. This may not be easy, and I will expect no help from Microsoft in finding out who this person (or persons) was that made this decision, but….eventually I will find out who made this decision, and I will kill them. This is not an idle threat – I will pursue this matter until it is resolved…whoever is responsible for this incredibly ridiculous implementation of what would be an otherwise useful tool will die at my hands, hopefully in a bloody, painful fashion. You will not get away. -J*hn ******
请读完以下所有文字，这件事是很严肃的。就在今天，我发现在Windows 95中，没有任何开关、命令行选项或任何方式可以使XCOPY在操作时包含隐藏或系统文件。很明显，在Windows 95的产品研发过程中的某个时间点，某个家伙是有意让xcopy命令被设计成这样的。通过对Windows NT下的XCOPY的观察，也很容易得出（Windows 95下的XCOPY）被设计为我所描述的形式并非难以为之。故而，让我在这里把话说清楚，这可能不那么简单，我也不指望你们微软能帮忙找出是哪个人（或者哪些人）做出了这种决定，但是… 迟早我会把这个人扒出来，然后把他（们）都Kill掉。这可不是说说玩而已，我会持续推进这件事，直到找到那个人… 那个做出这个愚蠢到不行的决定、让XCOPY无法成为一个有用工具的人，一定会死在我的手上，而且但愿是以某种血溅四壁、痛苦不堪的形式死在我的手里。你别想逃得掉。——J*hn ******
J*hn, if you’re still out there… the switch for copying hidden files on Windows 95 is /H. Same as Windows NT.
J*hn，如果你看到这条消息…… Windows 95下XCOPY复制隐藏文件的开关是/H，跟Windows NT下是一样的。
Please don’t kill me.
饶了我8。
远嚣 Comment